Large companies use sport events to promote their products. Some people think this has a negative impact on sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The fact that sporting events have become a fertile ground for advertisements has become a hot topic for debate, with many arguing that this trend affects the sports industry negatively. From my perspective, I partly disagree with the statement.
To begin with, sports events being used as a platform for promotion can offer both the events and the sports team tremendous benefits. Firstly, advertising can help cover the event planning costs and make the events more accessible. Internationally-acclaimed sporting competitions can cost the host countries an astronomical amount of money that without sponsorships from large corporations, would not be paid off unless the entrance ticket is high-priced. This would drive fans away and hurt the event’s profit. For example, the 2021 Tokyo Olympics game is reported to have generated 2.25 billion US dollars in advertising revenue, which is almost 20 percent of the hosting cost. Secondly, advertisements can give sportsmen a better living standard, thus helping them take their mind off money problems and focus on the games. Some players even got rich thanks to product endorsements, namely Ronaldo and Messi.
Nevertheless, promoting products during sporting events can bring about negative consequences if the product is not ethical. As sports stars are influential figures, sports teams should be careful about what products they can endorse. To be more specific, research from Yale University in 2013 claimed that some sports sponsorships that featured junk food had increased the rate of child obesity. This is because children are impressionable, therefore, once they see famous athletes with fast food, they can have the wrong impression that this kind of food is wholesome and develop cravings for junk food.
In conclusion, while I believe that using sports events as a promotion platform can be beneficial, the organizers and the sportsmen should be aware of the impact of the products they advertise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-26 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | minhdo9966 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | minhdo9966 | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | phamngocmina | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-11 | quytnee | 73 | view |
- Should government regulate the fast food industries in the same way that regulates the drug alcohol and tobacco industries What is your opinion 56
- Environmental damage is the problem of most countries What factors damage the environment and what solutions to it 84
- Many factors motivate people in the workplace Of these money is the most important To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
- Large companies use sport events to promote their products Some people think this has a negative impact on sports To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...any arguing that this trend affects the sports industry negatively. From my perspectiv...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42671009772 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04198255481 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628664495114 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7431352047 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287198606693 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102378086863 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757574393151 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177372947667 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264930350536 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.