A large number of unmarried youngsters now live on their own in cities away from their hometowns. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend?
Almost any day of the week we can look at a newspaper and read articles discussing the increasing proportion of unmarried adolescents who live without elderly people in big cities. There are several points of view on this matter. The first claims that it is beneficial for youngsters as they earn real-life experience due to the fact that they have to earn money for living by themselves. An alternative point regards living separately as harmful and considers young people should live with parents until they are ready for adult life as the best option.
On the one hand, it is obvious that in recent years there have been some changes in the minds and lifestyles of youngsters as they tend to be independent from elderly people in any aspects of life. This trend is becoming more and more popular. It does not matter whether you like it or not you have to recognize the fact that living on their own can be beneficial and obtain some abilities, such as money budgeting, self-consciousness, time management. Moreover, nobody can deny that it is exceedingly difficult to replace real-life experience with something else totally.
However, this attitude may cause a lot of concerns among people who believe that after separating from parents everything will be absolutely different. It can be argued that youngsters who are pursuing money can forget about other things, such as education, marriage, and time for self-development. Of crucial importance is how we define the matter in question. It is often said that living with parents may lead to some problems, such as infantility and spendthriftness. But it is necessary to take into account all the circumstances of each individual case.
From my point of view, the latter opinion makes sense definitely, as it follows from my own experience, as I live with my parents. In any way, an attitude to this issue always depends on a particular person’s character and his or her personal background.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-10 | Nurbakyt2oo1 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010 89
- The bar chart shows the number of visitors to three London Museums between 2007 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The best way to improve health is to do exercise To what extent do you agree 67
- The advantages of English spreading as a global language will continue outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wspaper and read articles discussing the increasing proportion of unmarried adole...
^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o some problems, such as infantility and spendthriftness. But it is necessary to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00306748466 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95706953386 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5488984069 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.733333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150373300149 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449193235776 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310300316166 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887152863596 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229564229489 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.