Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people. Some people think younger leaders would be better. Do you agree or disagree.
Do every companies have leaders or directors. Higher positions are prevalently occupied by elderly members in great number of organisations, in recent days. However, it has been argued that younger staff would manifest better leadership. I am confident of that senior managers have huge experience and reputation to manage to employees and develop company.
Elderly people have an adequate experience rather than young one's. People who made career ladder have a lot of internship in problematic situations. Senior managers know not only about improving company's condition but also limitations within company. Because of this vantage they can make feasible solutions.
From another side, great reputation is a key factor in which older people become leaders. Aged people are likely to gain more support from the people in an organisation. Seniors have mutual language with all staff which might help understanding each other and work in one direction. This interpersonal communication skills might demonstrate tremendously effect to success of a leader. While staff respect each other, all power and intention will go to correct way.
Considering all of this, senior managers have increasingly tendency to manage to all staff. And also, young people despite their deep knowledge should acquire experience in a difficult situation in order to be a leader in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | akbarf | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Shakhzod Yodgorov | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Shakhzod Yodgorov | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the number of employees from the European Union in the United States (1999).Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information show below 22
- fg
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 77
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 78
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information and reporting the mein features and make comparision where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun internship seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of internships'.
Suggestion: a lot of internships
...nes. People who made career ladder have a lot of internship in problematic situations. Senior manag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...on but also limitations within company. Because of this vantage they can make feasible...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o limitations within company. Because of this vantage they can make feasible solu...
^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to understand' or 'understand'.
Suggestion: to understand; understand
...anguage with all staff which might help understanding each other and work in one direction. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 212.0 315.596192385 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48113207547 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88800612667 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.698113207547 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8899327937 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.4666666667 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1333333333 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2 7.06120827912 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151101312611 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515455656595 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552345477091 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088934272671 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234046933585 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.91 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.