The leaders of most organizations tend to be older people. However, some argue that younger people make better bosses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is said that young people manage organizations well. Although I agree with this statement, I think that organizations must have both young and old leaders.
Young people are capable of becoming better leaders because of the following reasons. First, young leaders are more sensitive to trends, which could be advantageous for the organization’s image. For instance, young leaders can come up with creative ideas to boost the brand’s popularity. Second, thanks to their open-mindedness, young bosses can enabling more disruptive innovations. For example, conglomerates in the technology industry nowadays were founded by young people: Google was established by the 25-year-old duo - Larry Page and Sergey Brin.
Old bosses have experience in leading organizations for the following reasons. First, older managers will enjoy the advantage of experiences. So that they will be able to assess the situation more thoroughly and make more informed decisions. Second, another significant reason to consider senior member of an organization as leader is that he has good idea of the manner, gesture and social skills of his colleagues. From this perspective, he can assign a group of agile and energetic staff to do a specialized task e.g. market data analysis for a competitive product.
In conclusion, because of the mentioned reasons, I believe that elder people are the more experienced person to lead their organizations, but I think younger people are capable of becoming better leaders.
- Many people believe that students should not take standardized tests To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The leaders of most organizations tend to be older people However some argue that younger people make better bosses To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The leaders of most organizations tend to be older people However some argue that younger people make better bosses To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., first, if, second, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 231.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50649350649 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12015379282 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632034632035 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2467529648 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8461538462 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7692307692 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196500239629 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724573423033 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516907825009 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124276289024 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195873939675 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.