Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of knowing history is an ongoing debate. While some people think that being knowledgable about the past is nonbeneficial in our lives today, I oppose this view because studying earlier events could benefit individuals by giving a substantial lesson on historical acts of heroism and help to recognize the mistakes that can be avoided in the future.
It is worth considering that events of the past are valuable as it provides information about what our ancestors did to build and develop our respective cultures. Moreover, ancient people devoted their efforts to protect their countries from violence during world wars.
For instance, a Filipino army general named Antonio Luna who fought in the Philippine–American War in 1898 and regarded as one of the toughest generals of his time became famous in the Philippines because of his bravery, unusual style of fighting, and strict discipline. Therefore, these heroic acts gave a sense of pride and motivation to contribute to the development of our society.
In addition, people never know more about their mistakes if they do not look back at the past. Learning from failures of our ancestors, along with examples of the losses those errors can cause, gives us a warning as to why we should not repeat them. For example, during World War II,
most of Adolf Hitler's military campaigns were modeled from the strategy of the deceased Napoleon Bonaparte. While doing so, Hitler failed to study Napoleon’s losses when he attempted to send his soldiers into Russia. Because Hitler emulated this kind of campaign, his soldiers met the same fate. For this reason, we need to carefully study historical events to avoid repeating again.
To conclude, I completely disagree with the belief of some people that learning history has no beneficial outcome for modern society because being familiar with past events gives us the ability not only to recognize the successes of our ancestors but also to learn from past mistakes.
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 68
- The line graph illustrates the number of magazine sales by a publisher in 4 European countries between 1999 and 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 87
- Some people think that secondary school children should study international news as one of the school subjects. Other people think that it is a waste of valuable school time. What do you think? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example 73
- Some people think that it is important to use leisure time for activities that improve the mind, such as reading and doing word puzzles. Other people feel that it is important to rest the mind during leisure time. Discuss both views and give your own opin 78
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do u agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... them. For example, during World War II, most of Adolf Hitlers military campaigns...
^^^^
Line 13, column 373, Rule ID: REPEAT_AGAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'repeating'.
Suggestion: repeating
...efully study historical events to avoid repeating again. To conclude, I completely disagre...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18518518519 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78997322878 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626543209877 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.1773182818 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.230769231 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179718556905 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522054712278 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552586709642 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893436532078 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653057352002 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.