Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Learning is a process that people can enhance by doing, again and again, something to avoid the errors. History and the past eras show us our faults in the field of economic, political and peace and, these mistakes teach us important lessons about future strategies. According to my point of view, the past is very essential to shape up living of the present people, therefore; I strongly disagree from above argument and, for this, I have some arguments and personal experiences.
The present people's lifestyle is dependent upon their ancestors. We can see easily that if someone has any specific disease in their ancestors then they have more probability to get that disease so that for this reason they should have more precautions about it. On the other hand, we can also learn some good things, for example, people in the past had simple life and food, therefore; they were less likely to have complex diseases. Moreover, they lived a hard and active life. Now we can follow the same ways to avoid fatal diseases.
The past also teaches us about the process of the next things. As we look in science, scientist cannot do new inventions without the roadmap of the past inventions. New technology is coming from the practice behavior of doing wrong. For instance, if we look at the new mobile phone then we will release that it involves the whole century and process.
To sum up the argument, the past is always beneficial in learning and shaping the life of the present people. Life without history is nothing but just a fact of the present thing without reason. The past and history provide us reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-27 | Nanddy | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-19 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | Kubraguran | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | ATUL SAI DONAKANTI | 71 | view |
| 2021-03-19 | elisabetta_fedele | 84 | view |
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns 56
- Some people believe online reading materials should only be used for a child to learn to read whereas others believe only printed material should be used Discuss both view and give your opinion 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development 67
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money Do you agree or disagree Which other types of job should be highly paid Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ow 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... and personal experiences. The present peoples lifestyle is dependent upon their ances...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77419354839 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42443910217 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587813620072 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9505946832 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195037784184 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635646013359 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322312129417 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117291869169 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183345280725 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.