Life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards.
Do you agree?
Despite the unexpectable future, people must move forwards, but the past can always give them lessons. Those can be implemented in economy to make business running well, also in education since self-reflections are important.
For business executives, looking at the past is compulsory because by learning from experiences, they will not repeat same mistakes, leading to more and more trading progress in each period. That is to say, if there has been knowledges about particular problem, it can be avoided easily by doing preventive actions. As an instance, a novel restaurant in Istanbul, Turkey was lack of consumers on fasting month, decreasing significantly about 78% than the average income in 2018, but they evaluated it carefully, hence they could tackle it in the following year. However, for people being not able to see a good side, failures can be a nightmare that makes them stuck from going ahead.
Meanwhile, in the education sector, students will only evaluate themselves after they move to the present and try to focus to the future. This is to say, when students surrender due to exams failure, they are more likely to have more expectation and keep self-esteem in conjunction with the challange to reach goals. As an example, Singapore students in senior high school failing exam are given personal reflections to express their sense toward such activities, having clear target at about 50 of 120 students, and those prepare to face globalisation challanges. Hence, if students can be rehearseal deliberately, they reduce the intensity of fail, but they over underestimate others.
Ultimately, people should go ahead to reach aims in the education field as evaluation tools, and those can conduct entrepreneur due to improving economic basis, showing both to be reflected. Where possible, people should more concern on the future and the past as reflection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-06 | Hestivivin | 84 | view |
- The lifecyle of salmon by estuary
- The world economy Gross Domestic Product GDP by country in 2018 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- The map shows about the improvement in different area 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'Those cans'?
Suggestion: This can; Those cans
... the past can always give them lessons. Those can be implemented in economy to make busin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 616, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students can be rehearseal deliberately, they reduce the intensity of fail, but t...
^^
Line 8, column 98, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this can' or 'those cans'?
Suggestion: this can; those cans
...ducation field as evaluation tools, and those can conduct entrepreneur due to improving e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 146, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
...n conduct entrepreneur due to improving economic basis, showing both to be reflected. Wh...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, so, well, while, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27242524917 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90070324487 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647840531561 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5947752523 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.25 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15892362175 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643721093968 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646006382452 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100277937936 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371166321122 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.