Sometimes people have to live in a country that requires them to speak nonnative language. Some people opine that this may cause significant problems in social and practical matters. I completely agree with this view because of several reasons.
Firstly, the reason why speaking in foreign language will create social problem is because language serves as a communication bridge between people. In communication, whether it is a long or short conversation, people use language to convey what they want to say. As a result, someone who does not understand the language that most people use will most likely to be isolated from any social circle. This can happen everywhere, from neighborhood to working places. For example, a guy from United States just moved to Japan, where most people are speaking Japanese, including in his neighborhood. Because he does not really master Japanese, he then faces social problem where he can not blend in with his social circle in his neighborhood.
Secondly, the reason why speaking foreign language can cause practical problem is because language is inseparable from doing daily activities. This can be purchasing public transportation tickets, ordering food menu, to using public facilities. All of these activities require understanding foreign language. Hence, if one does not understand the language that is mainly used, he will face practical problem where his daily activities are hampered. For instance, a guy from United Kingdom just migrated to Taiwan, where almost all food menus are written in Mandarin Chinese. Because he does not really master Mandarin Chinese, he then faces a practical problem where he finds difficulty in ordering food menu.
In conclusion, I completely agree that settling in a country which requires us to speak foreign language will cause both significant practical and social problems because language serves as a communication bridge between people and language is inseparable from doing daily activities.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 87
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both these vi 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41935483871 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8562799351 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477419354839 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.879606671 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330056814057 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116461247178 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784776401704 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234370167643 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340233617467 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.