Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, there has been an ongoing argument that speaking foreign language in another country can contribute to not only some detrimental issues in society but also obstacle relating to practicing. From my perspective, I do not advocate for this idea except in several cases.
There are a plethora of merits for language learners to speak a foreign language. First, since almost residents in a particular place using their mother tongue to communicating together, speaking with them could result in the improvement of learning new language. In fact, by talking English in USA, some people, especially migrants, sharpen their English ability which is really useful for them to integrate easily into local society. Second, by communicating with the locals in local language, they have more chances to make friends and broaden their social horizons. This means that they can take part in more new activities and explore new interests, thus, their life in oversea countries becomes more enjoyable.
Apart from the practical advantages I mentioned above, this idea still has some disadvantages relating to misunderstanding and their first language. Regarding misunderstanding, speaking a foreign language is not simple, which means that it could lead to misunderstanding conversation. Someone, thus, who is not efficient in other languages, they could find it hard to integrate into local society. In addition, their first language skills will be spoiled thereby rarely using. For instance, if someone using second languages for a long-lasting period, they will be unable to talk by their mother tongue fluently.
In conclusion, although this idea has some drawbacks, I still advocate for this opinion because of myriad merits it brings relating to improving foreign language skills and social aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | sepide1367 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | olParya | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Nimaianp75 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Varpuleva | 78 | view |
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of emloyees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace everyday.Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages. 61
- Writing task 1 the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 78
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
... rarely using. For instance, if someone using second languages for a long-lasting per...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, regarding, second, so, still, thus, apart from, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5035971223 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93764009199 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579136690647 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.692754917 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.692307692 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76923076923 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114305529968 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470082841794 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385061982902 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784227562185 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214026760876 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.