Looking at the status of food safety and food hygiene, there are clearly some challenges for Vietnam. Please describe your opinions.
The road from the stomach to the graveyard of each of us has never beenso short and easy," delegate Tran Ngoc Vinh once said. That is correct.
Because the fact demonstrates that the issue of food hygiene and safety in Vietnam today has been and continues to be a concern, it has not been truly effective due to numerous difficulties and challenges.
Firstly, the population explosion. Combined with rapid urbanization, is causing changes in people’s eating habits, promoting the development of rampat street food services that are difficult to ensure hygiene and safety and whole food. More and more processed foods, more communal kitchens are the dangers that are causing a wave of food poisoning cases.
Furthermore, rapid population growth depletes natural resources, with a lack of clean water used for daily life and eating having a significant impact on food hygiene and safety.
Secondly, environmental pollution. The development of industries results in a more polluted environment, which affects livestock and plants. Levels of contaminated food increased, particularly in ponds and lakes containing industrial wastewater, and heavy metal residues in livestock increased.
Thirdly, scientific and technological advancements. The application of new scientific and technological achievements in animal husbandry, cultivation, production, and food processing raises the risk of food contamination due to pesticide and preservative residues in vegetables and fruits; residues of veterinary drugs in meat and foods using genetic technology, the use of many toxic chemicals and unallowed additives, as well as many unsanitary processes, raise the risk of food contamination.
Last but not least, the law and human consciousness. The problem of food processing continues to have many flaws due to the level and scale of food production and processing in our country, with nearly 90% being handmade, households, and individuals with a sense of belonging. Some organizations, food production, business establishments, and consumers continue to fail to comply with food hygiene and safety laws. The market's trade and exchange process has not been effectively controlled; fake food, poor quality food, and smuggled food are still in circulation.
In conclusion, looking at the status of food safety and food hygiene, there are clearly some challenges for Vietnam.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-16 | ciara-tade | 84 | view |
- Looking at the status of food safety and food hygiene there are clearly some challenges for Vietnam Please describe your opinions
- Looking at the status of food safety and food hygiene there are clearly some challenges for Vietnam Please describe your opinions
- Looking at the status of food safety and food hygiene there are clearly some challenges for Vietnam Please describe your opinions
- Looking at the status of food safety and food hygiene there are clearly some challenges for Vietnam Please describe your opinions 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...bsp;beenso short and easy,' delegate Tran Ngoc ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,  
...nues to be a concern, it has not been tru...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,  
...;and more processed foods, more communal kitchens are the dan...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2437.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 8.40344827586 5.12529762239 164% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 23.3887095845 2.80592935109 834% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613793103448 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.60771543086 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 172.781329301 49.4020404114 350% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.071428571 106.682146367 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.38176352705 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11817535686 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114539025349 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169343396402 0.0667982634062 254% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161450621598 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.200875101011 0.056905535591 353% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.5 13.0946893788 218% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 8.88 50.2224549098 18% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 31.44 12.4159519038 253% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.