As machines have become more sophisticated, more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically. Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects?
Physical jobs or tasks, which include a lot of strength, are now becoming less demanding and can be automatically processed by cutting-edge machines. This trend has benefits and obstacles, but I support the idea that its advantages outweigh its hurdles.
On the one hand, this trend has numerous evolutionary effects on different perspectives of our life, especially on improving the quality of jobs and working conditions. Workers used to have dangerous working conditions and they suffered while working because of gadgets’ insufficiency. However, in today’s time, due to the enhancement of machines, jobs are becoming less demanding and more productive. Physical strength can’t compare with the speed of machines. Thus, all workers have to do today is to supervise machines doing the work and fix problems. Moreover, working conditions are much safer than in the past, and help prevent unpredictable accidents while working in a factory. In a fast-changing world, modern machines support workers with their workplace and the difficulties their demanding jobs cause and improve their living standards.
On the other hand, machines would lessen the number of jobs available for the unemployed. Some people believe that if machines are responsible for 80% of our work duty in a machine, workers are likely to become jobless or get low-paid. Machines make jobs and tasks convenient, but they are likely to increase the percentage of unemployment; thus, more and more people become homeless and live hard life. From different perspectives, this trend’s drawback is not challenging if we utilize machines effectively.
In conclusion, I agree that this trend’s positive contributions outweigh its disadvantage when we know how to make the best of the equipment.
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia in 2018 84
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003 70
- nitrogen is very important for the life on earth Over 90 of the earth s supply exists as a gas in the atmosphere The diagram below describes the nitrogen cycle 61
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The percentage of people who were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting this main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46350364964 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06949060982 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580291970803 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2923182854 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369609142279 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105048547008 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581713391719 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184993187223 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589183848154 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.