The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate the evolutionary progression of the horse over a span of 40 million years. In summary, the process can be delineated into four distinct stages, commencing with the Eohippus 40 million years ago and culminating in the contemporary form of the horse.
Initially, 40 million years ago, the Eohippus displayed a diminutive size and tail. Notably, its foot structure comprised the highest number of toes among the depicted stages. Progressing to the subsequent stage, the Mesohippus represented an advancement, featuring increased size, a longer tail, and legs. Moreover, this species exhibited a reduction in the number of toes compared to the Eohippus.
Following this, the Merychippus emerged, characterized by a more abundant mane fur in comparison to its predecessors. It was evident that both the tail and legs of this species experienced considerable elongation. The ultimate stage in this evolutionary sequence depicted the development into the modern horse. This final form exhibited a denser mane, an extended tail, and a simplified foot structure.
- The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003 70
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58181818182 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18250497638 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630303030303 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.7728539359 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.1 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129963333391 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526596102011 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676148884076 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940587204427 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0661353928306 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.