The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictures depict the evolution of the horse over a span of 40 million years.
Overall, there are four stages that highlight the differences that occurred to the horse, beginning with the Eohippus, which existed 40 million years ago and ending with the development of the modern horse.
Initially, 40 million years ago, the size and the tail of the first horse called Eohippus were relatively small. In terms of the foot structure, the first horse had the most toes. In the next stage, the Mesohippus was a slightly better version of the previous one, with a bigger size, a longer tail and legs. There were also less toes in the foot structure of this species compared to that of the Eohippus.
Following this, the Merychippus emerged, the horse that had more mane fur than the previous horses. It was evident that its tail and legs grew longer than the older horses. The final stage was the development into the modern horse, the form with a denser mane, an extended tail, and a simplified foot structure.
- Technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 61
- Some people think the manufacturers or shopping malls should sell less packaged products and others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun toes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...a longer tail and legs. There were also less toes in the foot structure of this spec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78409090909 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37625021465 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7615771633 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5555555556 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129195805742 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578597464708 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621289869618 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0978647090211 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530414516629 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.