The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The diagrams illustrate how animals’ bodies changed through evolutionary times, which were millions of years.
Overall, the body has had a significant change; also the size of hooves has become bigger and bigger as the years pass.
The first representative of the line that led to the modern horse, Eohippus, appeared about 40 million years ago. Eohippus had the smallest bone structure in the revolution, with the same size as the fox. It also can be seen that the hooves are small and weak. Over 10 millions later, the Mesohippus had evolved into a larger form and longer tail. The number of digits reduced to three and the middle one becomes larger. The important factor was they had thin mane on the neck/ back.
The next updated version was Merychippus whose body became bigger, larger tail and thicker mane on the back, turned up 15 million years ago. The feet remained three-toed, but the size between the middle toes and the two sides were huge. Finally, Modern horse’s toes show a reduction in number from 4 to 1. The central third toe grows stronger and firmer, the adjacent toes become shorter and thinner.
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 79
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 41
- The table below shows the salaries of secondary high school teachers in 2009 78
- 14 1 2017 In schools and universities girls tend to choose arts while boys like sciences What are the reasons for this tendency and do you think this tendency should be changed 76
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hey had thin mane on the neck/ back. The next updated version was Merychippus wh...
^^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e back, turned up 15 million years ago. The feet remained three-toed, but the size ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 938.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86010362694 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38205637964 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652849740933 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2216328929 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.1666666667 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0833333333 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0864212858267 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299154100464 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332342164818 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501125730903 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141826658632 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.