14.1.2017: In schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts while boys like sciences. What are the reasons for this tendency and do you think this tendency should be changed?
Subject choice is a vital factor in school and university life. These days, numerous female students are enrolling in art classes, while males tend to opt for science subjects. Many reasons can answer this trend, and I believe that it is best not to apply any changes to this tendency.
Several reasons explain why students choose different courses at school and tertiary levels. First, the most significant is the natural characteristic of genders, male students are interested in calculating, and analytical abilities to outperform, for example, maths and science. And girls are more emotional and sensitive to have advantages in understanding some subjects relate to the imagination, such as arts, and literature. Furthermore, each of the two sexes shows their distinct excellence and strengths in their favored kind of subjects. As a result, they tend to participate in the classes that suit their capacity.
I believe that this tendency should not be altered for some reasons. Initially, the subject choice is their right, so parents should not force children to study subjects they do not enjoy. For example, they compel their schoolgirl students to learn sciences instead of literature which leads to bad results and poses enormous pressure. In addition, the option of the course does not rely on gender. These days, girls still pursue natural grades, and boys can participate in art courses. Therefore, letting them be free and making them feel that they are respected and listened to.
In conclusion, the choice of subjects is not related to gender but their innate abilities and preferences. This trend does not harm and should not be changed.
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce fertilizer compost 78
- The bar chart gives information about the food loss and waste at the different stages of production in developed and developing countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 61
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy 82
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages 11
- Many people have a close relationship with their pets These people treat their birds cats or other animals as members of their family In your opinion as such relationships good Why or Why not 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21348314607 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7369078828 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.062834223 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6875 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259696144313 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765764765621 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768664384793 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152586943947 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697630050133 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.