Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
As the significant technology development has generally opened a new era for humanity's standards of living, the meaning of public libraries's mainternance along with computer advancement has raised a controversal debate. While it is undeniable that the improvement on computer's software makes it possible to play the main functions of public libraries, I believe that the crucial roles of the latter are still remain globally-recognized.
The continuous achievements on improving computer technology has provided people a wider range of services that are distributed worldwide. Online libraries, in particular, are considerably one of the most common choice for ones who wants to utilize their limited amount of time. For example, a patient in hospital, despite the lack of opportunities to move, can access on an online library to obtain knowledge at any time. Consequently, that the flexibility and convenience of computer technology improve people's living condition is a generally-agreed fact.
Despite the noticeable benefits of computer advancement, traditional public libraries, to some other extent, possess many advantages in order not to be outshined by the former. Among the commonly-known benefits of this form of social educational area are human interaction and public space of learning. A physical location in form of public libraries enable inhabitants to acquire knowledge not only from several types of materials but also from others, a fact that contributes to a higher level of social interaction within a modern society. On the other hand, public libraries provides places where people can actually stay away from the hustle life and unwind themselves from daily stress, which online libraries failed to achieve. Those advantages has proves that maintaining physical public libraries is generally not a bad investment of local authorities in terms of raising citizen's satisfaction.
From these aforementioned discussion, it is agreeable that while online libraries, accompanied by computer technology, has became increasingly more convenient, public libraries still remain a considerable role in modern society.
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and socialdevelopment than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'computers'' or 'computer's'?
Suggestion: computers'; computer's
...t is undeniable that the improvement on computers software makes it possible to play the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 410, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
...e crucial roles of the latter are still remain globally-recognized. The continuous ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 753, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ies failed to achieve. Those advantages has proves that maintaining physical public...
^^^
Line 5, column 882, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...f local authorities in terms of raising citizens satisfaction. From these aforementio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...accompanied by computer technology, has became increasingly more convenient, public li...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, if, so, still, while, for example, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75078864353 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31085442269 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599369085174 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.451094901 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.916666667 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185263297849 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672684539122 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274342483016 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104376493952 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189242547319 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.