Many animal species are become extinct due to human activities on land and in sea. what are the reasons for this and what can be done to solve this issue
A wide range of terrestrial and marine animals are indeed being threatened by negative human activities. There are several reasons why this is the case, and this essay will provide some measures to address this problem.
The disappearance of many species of animals is blamed on human activities. First of all, on the land, a vast of rainforest areas have been destroyed in recent years, As a result, species' habitat is being affected crucially and they find it difficult in finding a new home to live in as well as adapting to the new environment. This would put these species at higher risk of extinction. Secondly, human activities, including intended fishing and overexploitation in the sea, are causing damage to the marine ecosystem. For instance, overexploitation could directly affect the species' food chain or even pare the diversity of species.
Some feasible actions can be taken by the government to preserve the ecosystem. The first one is that they impose stricter punishment on deforestation and overexploitation by heavy fines or prison sentences way, such as illegal logging. Moreover, the government can also apply " Green taxes " to the organizations and companies that have behavior discharging wastes, wastewater, or even excess food into the rivers, and oceans without being treated prior. For instance, a Lux Company in VietNam paid 1 billion for the environment tax due to burying 3 tons of non-recycle waste under the land.
In conclusion, there are some reasons why this trend occurs and the government can implement a number of methods to limit or prohibit devastating activities to the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | jadenguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | jadenguyen | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | jadenguyen | 67 | view |
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 61
- when choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation 82
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 61
- M t s ng i ngh r ng s c kh e t t l r t quan tr ng i v i m i ng i v v y d ch v y t kh ng n n c i u h nh b i c c c ng ty v l i nhu n u i m c a d ch v y t t nh n c v t tr i h n nh c i m kh ng 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23484848485 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05165771085 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8269791169 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283866897095 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940267747601 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055535919909 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160716149219 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464391125516 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23484848485 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05165771085 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8269791169 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283866897095 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940267747601 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055535919909 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160716149219 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464391125516 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.