Many animals are endangered. Some people argue that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In many parts of the world, animal species are on the verge of extinction. Many hold a belief that individuals and governments should only preserve animals that are economically beneficial to human. However, to the best of my knowledge, all animals that are being threatened should be protected.
Firstly, it is noteworthy that the interdependence of species is the main characteristic of eco-balance. Many zoological studies have shown that although it is invisible, the survivals of living species are closely intertwined in one way or another. Therefore, it is a grave mistake to overlook that fact that the extinction of one species is accompanied by demise of other species. For example, poisonous snakes are widely considered as dangerous animals; however, the underpopulation of snakes in farming regions has resulted in the overpopulation of rats, which have chronic effects on agricultural yields. This example is the illustration of the fact that all threatened animals should be preserved.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this is that we should only protect animals that are useful to humans, because individuals and governments that are on tight budget have to spend money in various social aspects, typically education and medication. This argument is reasonable to some degree; however, it is incomplete, what they fail to take into account is
the fact that despite the high expenses of animal preservation, deterring the extinction of threatened animals should be regarded as the top priority to all governments. Futhermore, we are not able to predict the future and some species that are classify as unuseful to humans.
In conclusion, all animals in danger of extinction should be protected for the reasons mentioned above
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 56 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | maiphuong0610 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentages of both males and females who ate 5 kinds of fruits and vegetables per day in the UK in 2006 78
- In many countries traditional foods are being replaced by international fast foods This is having a negative effect on both families and societies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- The map shows the change of Bell Hill from a farm in 1976 to an Environmental Study Centre in 2006 84
- People think that in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Parents should encourage children to spend less time studying and more time doing physical activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...species are on the verge of extinction. Many hold a belief that individuals and governmen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'classified'.
Suggestion: classified
...ct the future and some species that are classify as unuseful to humans. In conclusion, ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38267148014 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1948336679 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530685920578 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1189217472 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267305271042 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991011441834 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075600622795 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161588653088 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657119063169 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.