Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?
In recent decades, the question of whether vaccination for children should mandatory or not has sparked a controversy among the public. Although parents have the right to raise their offspring in their own way, I believe the fact that all children are vaccinated bestows a wide range of benefits to the well being of the public.
On the one hand, there are both medical and non-medical reasons why the refusal of vaccination has been gradually rising in some countries. The primary reason for this trend can be attributed to religious belief which claims that children should grow up naturally without any medical intervention. In fact, by maintaining healthy lifestyles, toddlers can be less prone to infectious diseases. Additionally, due to various unknown side effects of these vaccines, parents are likely to choose this method as a safer way to protect their babies. According to recent research in rural area, low-quality vaccines led to the development of other issues like allergy or rash in kids, which make vaccination becomes a threat to infants’ wellbeing.
On the other hand, there are a myriads of compelling reasons why parents should immunize their children. Firstly, if vaccine is tested efficiently and effectively, it will facilitate the immune systems of infants. For example, with the assistance of vaccines, an increasing number of diseases such as yellow fever and strep throat have been eradicated. Secondly, having the majority of the population vaccinated will create heard immunity, thus, put children who are allergic to vaccines in secure condition. Thereby, obligatory vaccination is instrumental in ensuring public health.
In conclusion, although this enforcement is not without disadvantages, it will bring massive health benefits to the public. I believe that it is morally for parents to be legally required to vaccinate their children.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-18 | layla23012003 | 89 | view |
- More and more people today want to buy goods e g clothes and smartphones with well known brand names Why is this Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Cycling is the healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transportation Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons for this What can be done to make cycling more popular 84
- In many cities today most people live in large apartment blocks Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages 84
- Some people say that the best way to improve road safety would be to increase minimum legal age for driving a car or motorbike To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines Should parents be made by law immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
In recent decades, the question of whether vaccination for children should mandato...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a myriad' or simply 'myriads'?
Suggestion: a myriad; myriads
...lbeing. On the other hand, there are a myriads of compelling reasons why parents shoul...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41496598639 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93369269441 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612244897959 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1881241562 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297730818507 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991544976388 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797967764294 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189485471323 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437868531658 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.