Many countries believe that international tourism has harmful effects. Why do they think so? What can be done to change their views?
In this day and age, some individuals hold a view that tourists from other countries might cause a couple of detrimental impacts. The reasons for this phenomenon vary, and it can be tackled in some particular ways.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why some local citizens believe that foreign tourists lead to negative effects. The foremost reason is that international tourists might have a harmful influence on the local environment. Indeed, many travelers nowaday are criticized due to the fact that they are likely to dump waste and rubbish to the local habitat during their trips. Thus, it is deniable that they have contributed to the environment's pollution. Another factor that might be responsible for the unwelcomeness of local people for international tourism is the lack of reasonable knowledge of visitors for the local custom and culture. For example, a lot of visitors are wearing inappropriate clothes when going to some Asian countries, which is believed to encourage young generations to copy undesirable fashion.
On the other hand, there are certainly some measures that can be taken to change the local negative attitudes toward mass tourism. First and foremost, governments should enforce tourism industries to make sure that the local tourism operators are responsible for clearing litter and disposing of water in ways that do not harm the environment. If local citizens realize that visitors no longer cause detrimental harm for the habitat, this phenomenon might disappear. Secondly, tourists should be taught how to show their respect for the local orthodox culture. For example, foreign travelers should know some kind of clothes that are not suitable when going to some crucial place, such as pagodas or temples. Hence, this can avoid the angers of local people.
In conclusion, while the problem of harmful impacts from international tourism can be attributable to a range of causes, appropriate steps need to be taken to cope with the issues, not only by the government, but also individuals
- in their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real needs of the society in which those products are sold Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that using mobile phones and computers has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many countries believe that international tourism has harmful effects Why do they think so What can be done to change their views 73
- In this day and age advertisement is becoming one of the most effective ways for businesses to introduce their products There is an argument about advertising that its power not the demand of the society for products are sold is shown by the high incomes 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'environments'' or 'environment's'?
Suggestion: environments'; environment's
...iable that they have contributed to the environments pollution. Another factor that might be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 760, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s can avoid the angers of local people. In conclusion, while the problem of harm...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25076452599 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81425995683 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532110091743 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8134771918 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.466666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208326353346 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707232576247 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039222359357 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129190874238 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236380603699 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'environments'' or 'environment's'?
Suggestion: environments'; environment's
...iable that they have contributed to the environments pollution. Another factor that might be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 760, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s can avoid the angers of local people. In conclusion, while the problem of harm...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25076452599 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81425995683 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532110091743 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8134771918 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.466666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208326353346 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707232576247 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039222359357 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129190874238 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236380603699 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.