In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while other consider it as valuable working experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Children in many countries have already started to involve in different kinds of paid work. While there are opinions that against this idea, some people would suggest the benefits of working from an early age such as gaining valuable working experience as well as taking responsibility. Personally, I can understand the two opposing point of views. However, I would lean more towards the idea that using child labor is completely inappropriate and should not be encouraged whatsoever.
First of all, I appreciate the view that it is wrong to have children involve in doing paid work. In certain cases, it might be regarded as child abusement, as children are not illegible to be working. Exploiting young workers with minimum wages required would be against the law and working ethics. For instance, there was a famously known case in India about a factory that was accused of using child labor as their main human resource. Unsurprisingly, the business had to be closed down and the owner was sent to jail and had to pay compensation fees for the families of those young workers.
Second, I also understand why some people might view this idea as an opportunity for children to gain valuable working experience. To begin with, by working at a young age, children can be more discipline, responsible and independent. They can learn how to equip themselves with necessary skills in order to prepare for future working environment. Furthermore, they can grow faster and be more mature compare to their fellow peers. If children did not go to work, they would have to start from scratch when becoming adults and entering working fields. It would take more time and effort for them to reach the level of maturity than the one who has worked since they were little.
In summation, there are several reasons to explain why people may view paying children to work is inappropriate or bring certain valuable benefits. Nevertheless, I would support the first view more and would definitely not encourage any behaviors that involve exploiting child labor.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-10 | Tran Mai Phuong | 78 | view |
2018-11-26 | j85619 | 61 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case ? What can be done about this problem? 73
- Choose three of the following media and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. Identify the most effective one:Books, Comics, TV, Film, Theatre, Radio 89
- The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of a maJor university in 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1714.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02639296188 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72437332084 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565982404692 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4094321554 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.823529412 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292077184077 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956204146376 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870172039575 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177719056192 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642607835413 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.