In many countries, men and women are working full-time. It's, therefore, logical for women and men to share household tasks. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
working full-time has become increasingly popular these days. people who are devoted to their job claim that chores should be divided equally with their loved ones. this essay will argue why sharing housework is entirely rational.
Both men and women working full-time find it necessary to take care of their house equally. people living together should help each other in order to facilitate their household duties. Furthermore, such an attitude is considered to be a natural way of showing care and respect in a family. Indeed, according to the latest statistics carried out at the Harvard family study, 79% of respondents claim that sharing chores is an essential part of showing mutual relationships among family members. this data have bolstered a conviction that the vast majority of people perceive such help as a fundamental happy family life ingredient.
In the same time, though, those who say that household tasks comprise certain chores suitable only for men or women are quite correct. Sometimes this activity requires distinctive physical characteristics such as strength or stamina while carrying heavy things. Moreover, health condition should be considered to prevent accidents and painful circumstances. For example, a pregnant woman should not clean windows or repair the car as it might have a detrimental effect on her fetus. There have been some recorded instances of prenatal babies harmfully reacted to the mother's physical activities.
In conclusion, this essay argued that sharing housework among family members has always been an obvious way to show care and attention. However, distribution of duties should be done wisely, paying attention to the one's physical capacities to prevent accidents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | ajayjain831 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Melrose19 | 67 | view |
- In many countries, men and women are working full-time. It's, therefore, logical for women and men to share household tasks. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural backgrounds living together in the same country makes the country develop faster. Do you agree? 84
- Some believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have a high-level degree. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Working
working full-time has become increasingly popul...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...become increasingly popular these days. people who are devoted to their job claim that...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... divided equally with their loved ones. this essay will argue why sharing housework ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ry to take care of their house equally. people living together should help each other ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 496, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ual relationships among family members. this data have bolstered a conviction that t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1467.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47388059701 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77461442114 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649253731343 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1072331808 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135823816387 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462622107394 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745483258477 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755225797647 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356849594413 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.