In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why do people buy imported food? What could be done to encourage people to buy local food?
Hitherto, in a variety of nations, imported food is more popular with residents than local products. Although the mentioned issue is sensible, there are several methods to motivate national dwellers to buy local food.
Admittedly, there is an existing obsession that foreign food’s quality is significantly higher than local’s. This could be explained that foreign companies have been believed they could provide high-standard products for a long time ago, while local companies have just been developed recently. In addition, imported products are well advertised by various optimal strategies. For example, Oreo producing institution, to lure an enormous number of new consumers, hired an extremely famous girl group - Blackpink - to engage in their commercial advertisement. As a result, it is reasonable that people would rather buy foreign food than local products.
In terms of solutions to encourage people to use local products, the government could raise the imported food taxes and decrease the local’s. This suggested transition could make people concerned about buying food from other resources in lieu of choosing foreign food directly. In addition, the parallel improvement in the quality of national products might be optimal. Vinmart institution, for example, to attract more customers, sells high quality and organic vegetables at an easily affordable price. By doing those simultaneously, perhaps people could be lured to buy local food because they could use high-standard products at a reasonable price.
In conclusion, the understandable reason why people prefer using imported food exists; moreover, some effective solutions to motivate residents to use local food could be suggested and underway.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-02-27 | nvtrung309 | 67 | view |
2023-02-27 | nvtrung309 | 73 | view |
2021-09-04 | quynhnhu1921996 | 70 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71984435798 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97656604817 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583657587549 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1292878948 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.076923077 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.50794486819 0.244688304435 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190519033967 0.084324248473 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13401709188 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.330251642671 0.151304729494 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682598001702 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.