In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people.
To what extent do the advantages of having an ageing population outweigh the disadvantages.
Some people put forward the view that ageing population gives rise to problems for governments while others do not. From my perspective, the disadvantages of this trend, particularly a shortage of labors and health concern, can overshadow its drawback which is a lower inflation rates.
On the one hand, it is understandable why countries with a huge number of elderly people tend to suffer lower inflation rates. This is simply because most of the old people who are more likely to save up money for their next generation spend less for themselves. Thanks to this fact, the governments in nations with such high rates of old dwellers are not concern about inflation.
On the other hand, from my viewpoint, the disadvantages of old population outweight the drawbacks. Firstly, most ageing population countries are now in need of young labors. In fact, nations in such situation are more likely to hire international workers since a majority of old people are not healthy enough to get on with their jobs. For example, Japan, a country with 60% of elderly people, has spent a huge amount of money to attract foreign labours. Secondly, health concern is a problem which ageing population brings to the governments. The more people get older, the more a country spends on medical service. If this case lasts for long, there will be an imbalance in the investment for both the young and the elderly.
To conclude, the drawbacks of old population which is health problems and a shortage of labours tend to overshadow the benefit of lower inflation rates.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | lavien | 68 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 61 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now 78
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 78
- The pie charts display the proportion of key sources of energy used in the USA between 1980s and 1990s
- The chart below shows the number of households in the us by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s since a majority of old people are not healthy enough to get on with their jobs...
^^
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent for both the young and the elderly. To conclude, the drawbacks of old popula...
^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w the benefit of lower inflation rates.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95785440613 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77206705884 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7281569158 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5384615385 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278556286899 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101501624391 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753128553845 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162543703685 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067397475897 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s since a majority of old people are not healthy enough to get on with their jobs...
^^
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent for both the young and the elderly. To conclude, the drawbacks of old popula...
^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w the benefit of lower inflation rates.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95785440613 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77206705884 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7281569158 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5384615385 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278556286899 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101501624391 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753128553845 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162543703685 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067397475897 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.