In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in their local area. As a result, much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions.
Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantage
Word: 291
Due to a substantial increase in food demand that local products cannot meet and globalization, people currently consume a great amount of imported food such as cheese, seafood and fruit. From my point of view, this trend’s merits take precedence over its drawbacks.
On the one hand, using a wide range of foreign products poses far-reaching repercussions for the environment. Transporting food from other countries generates a greater carbon footprint in comparison with buying the food that is produced on our doorstep. This is because imported items such as American apples to Vietnam need to be transported a long distance by air or ship and refrigerated to keep them fresh during the delivery process. These means of transportation and methods of food preservation experience massive food miles and consume a great deal of fossil fuel, thereby increasing global warming.
Despite the negatives mentioned above, there are a plethora of benefits that imported foods offer to local residents and the domestic market. First, foreign foods diversify the dining experience of the region's food consumers. The locals can enjoy numerous off-season foods such as fresh bananas or kiwis all year round. They can also have a chance to get access to exotic cuisine from different cultures all over the world without travelling abroad. From an economic perspective, food imports and exports leverage the national economy through trade activities with partner nations. To exemplify, Vietnam, the world's second rice exporter, gains a billion dollars by exporting to the American market. Meanwhile, the USA is Vietnam's key supplier of agricultural products such as dairy products and wheat.
In conclusion, although importing food exerts detrimental implications on the environment, I believe that its advantages, including broadening dietary choices and uplifting the economy, far outweigh its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-08 | Lucasta | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-06 | Lucasta | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-23 | cat silver 602 | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-29 | Thu Phuong Dang | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | trinhthanh | 96 | view |
- In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown in their local area As a result much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantage 84
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are the main energy source for many countries However some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power or wind power To what extent do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 441, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'These means'?
Suggestion: This means; These means
...them fresh during the delivery process. These means of transportation and methods of food p...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 203, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'regions'' or 'region's'?
Suggestion: regions'; region's
... diversify the dining experience of the regions food consumers. The locals can enjoy nu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57337883959 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92642960995 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665529010239 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0455819293 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198034143294 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653804115732 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493204885571 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1141444479 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353330930501 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.