Topic 13/4/19: In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food that can be grown in their local area. As a result, much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages?
It is increasingly common to see food being transported from one area to another to meet the locals’ insatiable appetite. I believe that this trend is almost unavoidable and it has equal benefits and drawbacks.
When crops cannot be grown in a region simply due to the weather or soil, they will certainly be imported. Since the area responsible for export is encouraged to plant and harvest, its production and agricultural advances can be easily boosted. For example, Da Lat, a city in Vietnam, is renowned for their cultivation of cold-climate fruits such as strawberries. Thanks to this, their local economy has progressed to a great extent which contributes to the national development. Furthermore, it is undeniable that trading could foster good terms among regions. This partnership might even turn into friendship and benefit both parties in the long run.
However, there are some notable disadvantages of consuming products that do not originate from the local crops. Firstly, over-reliance on another area’s food provision can lead to an increase in the price of the products and the taxes levied on import. This transaction is likely to be unaffordable resulting in unsuccessful trades and dissatisfaction from consumers. Besides, the recipients most of the time have no control over the cultivation and packaging process or the use of fertilizers. To illustrate, if a poor region with sanitation regulations possesses monopoly over a plant, other regions will have no alternatives, but suffer from unhygienic products. Consequently, the quality and safety of the products cannot be ensured by the receivers.
In conclusion, it is mostly beneficial for some areas to resort to others for food production. However, there are still some drawbacks worth serious consideration to ensure a fair and safe trading process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-29 | Thu Phuong Dang | 84 | view |
- Topic 06 04 19 People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- Topic 13 4 19 In many countries people like to eat a wider variety of food that can be grown in their local area As a result much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvan 84
- Topic 30 6 19 Air travel is causing some problems for the environment therefore we should increase the price to discourage people Others disagree that this is the solution Discuss both views and give your own opinions 84
- Topic 04 05 19 Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports What are the reasons for this and is it a positive or negative development 84
- Topic 25 04 19 In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 756, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts cannot be ensured by the receivers. In conclusion, it is mostly beneficial f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, still, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37716262976 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15886823624 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650519031142 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.6238777346 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.125 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2026289928 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591604999104 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454371084434 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115700166959 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334817690823 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.