In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main type of rubbish. They cause water and land pollution, so they should be banned. To what extent do you agree?
It is said that the main reason for water and land pollution is the increasing use of plastic shopping bags in many countries. I agree with this point, and I believe that the use of them should be forbidden.
Nowadays we can see that the problem related to the environmental pollution is increasing every day as a result of human activities. The best example of these activities is the excessive use of plastic. In the modern life many people have consumerist lifestyle, and they always tend to buy new things. So, every day we see that many plastic bags are placed out of home just because people one to make rooms for their new belongings. Also, many factories pack their products with plastic, and people are forced to buy their heavily packed products. Plastic is something that is produced by toxic materials, and it is not recycled. Plastic also does not decompose in the nature. Therefore, it can have some negative impact on water and land. For example, some people empty their plastic bags into the sea or environment. Many animals like cats, dogs, birds and even aquatic animals may eat plastic wastes mistakenly as food. Plastic is not digestible, and the material used in the plastic can block the digestive tracts, which can endanger the lives of animals. This situation also can be risky for humans' lives, as all creatures in the world are in one life cycle, and this risk factor can be transferred to them.
Also, leaving plastic bags into nature can reduce the fertility of the soil and lands because they do not break down. The only disposal method for plastic is burning it, which can create other pollutions, such as air contamination. Also, plastic can release some toxic chemicals into the soil. The problem is that these materials can seep into the water sources and pollute them. As a result, it would be better for officials to ban the use and production of plastic and offer some eco-friendly alternatives, for example, fabric or reusable bags. In this way, they can better ensure the survival of animals, the health of people and even the cleanliness of the environment.
In conclusion, in my view, it is clear that the only positive point of plastic bags is that people can carry their purchases easily through it, however a small piece of plastic can cause many problems, such as air pollution, water contamination and even extinction of animals. We also have to consider that there are other activities which can hurt the environment but the use of plastic is one of the main reasons and the problem related to it is growing. So the use of plastic is necessary to be prohibited.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-22 | ojehparvaz | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-22 | ojehparvaz | 56 | view |
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situat 58
- Some people think that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- It is more harmful to compromise one s own beliefs than to adhere to them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 50
- Today s school should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today to what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Nowadays many people change jobs quite regularly rather than working in the company for their entire careers Why do you think this is happening How can companies keep their workers 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2166.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 453.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78145695364 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58062588111 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474613686534 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 687.6 506.74238477 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6397608789 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1739130435 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6956521739 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52173913043 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24446669478 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079023960612 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565405509014 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185571173893 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532115409715 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.