In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main type of rubbish They cause water and land pollution so they should be banned To what extent do you agree

Essay topics:

In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main type of rubbish. They cause water and land pollution, so they should be banned. To what extent do you agree?

It is said that the main reason for water and land pollution is the increasing use of plastic shopping bags in many countries. I agree with this point, and I believe that the use of them should be forbidden.

Nowadays we can see that the problem related to environmental pollution is increasing every day as a result of human activities. The best example of these activities is the excessive use of plastic. In modern life, many people have a consumerist lifestyle, and they always tend to buy new things. So, every day we see that many plastic bags are placed out of homes just because people tend to make rooms for their new belongings. Also, many factories pack their products with plastic, and people are forced to buy their heavily packed products. Plastic is something that is produced by toxic materials, and it is not recycled. Plastic also does not decompose in nature. Therefore, it can have some negative impacts on water and land. For example, some people empty their plastic bags into the sea or the environment. Many animals like cats, dogs, birds and even aquatic animals may eat plastic wastes mistakenly as food. Plastic is not digestible, and the material used in the plastic can block the digestive tracts, which can endanger the lives of animals. This situation also can be risky for humans' lives, as all creatures in the world are in one life cycle, and this risk factor can be transferred to them.

Also, leaving plastic bags into nature can reduce the fertility of the soil and lands because they do not break down. The only disposal method for plastic is burning it, which can create other pollutions, such as air contamination. Also, plastic can release some toxic chemicals into the soil. The problem is that these materials can seep into the water sources and pollute them. As a result, it would be better for officials to ban the use and production of plastic and offer some eco-friendly alternatives, for example, fabric or reusable bags. In this way, they can better ensure the survival of animals, the health of people and even the cleanliness of the environment.

In conclusion, in my view, it is clear that the only positive point of plastic bags is that people can carry their purchases easily through them, however, a small piece of plastic can cause many problems, such as air pollution, water contamination and even extinction of animals. We also have to consider that there are other activities which can hurt the environment but the use of plastic is one of the main reasons and the problem related to it is growing. So, the use of plastic is necessary to be prohibited.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-12-22 ojehparvaz 73 view
2021-12-22 ojehparvaz 56 view
Essays by user ojehparvaz :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 452.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79867256637 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58595953977 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477876106195 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 685.8 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0856732927 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3043478261 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.652173913 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52173913043 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244219737692 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079023960612 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565405509014 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185571173893 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532115409715 0.056905535591 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.