In many countries, the traditional of families having several generations living together is disappearing. What are reasons for this trend, and is it a positive or negative development.
In conjunction with the steps develop of society, people tend to live independently. As a consequence, families with numerous generations living together are no longer typical. In this essay, I will present the reasons, props and cons of this lifestyle.
Firstly, the younger generation wants independence and privacy. The sefl-reliant lifestyle is believe to help young people have their own property and control their lives. this way of living will create more motivation for young population to work; therefore, they will make more property and develop the economy. Hence, the young generation is able to pay for their income taxes and rent. However the more people choose to live independently, the more pressure there is on finding housing. For instance, the persentage of homeless people in the US increased by in 2022 because too many people move out of their homes and the states could not slove the problem of a lack of housing.
Secondly, it is about the generation gap. In different periods, generations do not have the same way of thinking; thus, generations find it difficult to understand each other, which leads to unnecessary arguments. they will more comfortable and have better quality of live whenever they live on their own. Nevertheless, if the old generation cannot take care of themselves, then when the young generations gets old, they will be put in a similar situation, and the cycle continues.
In conclution, the traditional way of mutiple generations live in the same house have both advantages and disavantages. I believe that everyone can consider and select the path that is best for them. The significant things that create a family are the close-knit among members, the support and understanding between each member.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | phuonganhnguien | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | phuonganhnguien | 61 | view |
- In many countries the traditional of families having several generations living together is disappearing What are reasons for this trend and is it a positive or negative development 61
- In many countries the traditional of families having several generations living together is disappearing What are reasons for this trend and is it a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 94, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
... privacy. The sefl-reliant lifestyle is believe to help young people have their own pro...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...r own property and control their lives. this way of living will create more motivati...
^^^^
Line 2, column 390, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...to pay for their income taxes and rent. However the more people choose to live independ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
..., which leads to unnecessary arguments. they will more comfortable and have better q...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and understanding between each member.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18309859155 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91981037067 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573943661972 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5654604209 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24049610711 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07748084367 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418132797928 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14903833111 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281406052499 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.