The fact cannot be denied that the artificial food has a great popularity among society. Traditional food has been replaced by international fast or junk food, as it affects negatively on families and public. I also agree with this viewpoint and I shall articulate the reasons behind this in the upcoming paragraphs.
On the one side of the coin, international junk food such as street food, pizzas, burgers and many more have a negative impact on humans. As, these food donot have proper nutrients or minerals that one's body need. Moreover, it affect to immune system, as it donot provide energy. For instance, cold drinks like coca cola is made up of 90% of coal, as the residents of some overseas country consume this in regular routine. The real state of drinks can be found by heating and to digest these drinks, an individual's body require extra amount of water. This may cause deaths in earlier age. Hence, artificial food acquires more negative impact.
On the contrary, traditional food contain a great quantity of minerals, nutrients and vitamins. These are mainly grown in fields in an organic form or way. In today's world, older people are more healthier and physically fit than the new generation. This is due to that, in past time, organic food was in demand and older people used to consume that which gave them energy and protect them from bacteria or disease. Food like rice, maize, mustard leaves and so on gives the satisfaction while eating. Therefore, families and societies prefer to traditional food rather than fast food as they know the beneficial effects of that food.
In conclusion, it is true that youngsters are more fond of fast food which affects negatively to their body whereas, traditional food have more benefits to survive healthier and for longer period in the society.
- Many efforts has been made by countries to address challenges concerning the environment but the situation has not improved What are the possible reasons for environment degradattion are there any solution to combat 71
- In many countries traditional food is being replaced by international fast food This has negative effects on both families and societies To what extend do you agree or disagree 67
- More and more people are working from home rather than at the workplace Some people say this will bring benefits to the workers an their families but other think it will being stress to the home Discuss both the view and give your opinion 56
- Some people are afraid to go out for fear of being robbed on the streets Still there are robberies that happen inside houses What do you think is the best thing a person can do to ensure his her own security Use specific reasons and examples to support yo 78
- In many countries people tend to move overseas or move to a different part of their country after their retirement Discuss why it is so and the outcomes of this situation Provide specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this food' or 'these foods'?
Suggestion: this food; these foods
...e have a negative impact on humans. As, these food donot have proper nutrients or minerals...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...erals that ones body need. Moreover, it affect to immune system, as it donot provide e...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'healthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: healthier
... way. In todays world, older people are more healthier and physically fit than the new generat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...new generation. This is due to that, in past time, organic food was in demand and older p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93790849673 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55518150816 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584967320261 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1034805393 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8823529412 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376939290473 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111530112882 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109816632295 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233821216043 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735018523326 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.