Many countries want to host international sports events, while other countries think that hosting sports events has more problems than benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
International sporting events have been shown to entice millions of spectators around the globe. The attention they garner proves to be lucrative to some nations but seems problematic to others. This essay will discuss both the ramifications and benefits associated with organising and hosting such events on a large scale.
On the one hand, international sports matches can be the catalyst that worsens the alarming problem of pollution worldwide. There comes a great need for transportation and living arrangements for athletes and sports fanatics alike, leading to great amounts of exhaust fumes discharged from vehicles and wastewater into the environment. Furthermore, a large body of tourists often leaves behind heaps of litter and plastic bags in their wake. In the aftermath of a multinational competition, the hosting venues are those that most suffer the problem of augmented pollution, which then disrupts the livelihoods of natives.
On the other hand, international sporting competitions endow nations with numerous advantages. Firstly, the improved facilities required to accommodate world-class tournaments are invaluable to grassroots sports development. To those who aspire to become athletes, being able to practice in a high-quality and well-equipped facility such as Olympic-sized swimming pools or premium-graded ice rinks is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Provided with such resources, the up-and-coming sportsmen and women will be nurtured for further development deep in the field. Last but not least, these events are a perfect chance for a nation to promote the national image to an international audience far and wide. With hoards of spectators flooding in, more people will be in contact with the said country. The new knowledge not only creates a distinct value and a strong impression of the host country in the tourists’ mind but also generates business opportunities. Brazil was a case in point. The country successfully managed to gross millions of dollars from selling their traditional Vuvuzela flutes after hosting the 2014 FIFA World Cup.
In the analysis, it is my conviction that the inherent benefits outweigh the resulting problems when acting as a host country for large-scale international sporting events. With suitable measures put in place, pollution can be minimised and merits to be reaped for the prosperity and reputation of a nation and a region on the world map.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-28 | Lo Ngoc Son | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | oanhnth | 89 | view |
| 2020-10-23 | random.creature | 73 | view |
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by government rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advance technology which can prevent and solve crime Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that big companies should provide sports and social facilities for the local community To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years What are the positive and negative effects of this trend 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, then, well, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52956989247 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21245894497 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4109596083 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.277777778 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246365583806 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706780831194 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707642489279 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154351323509 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377321743428 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.