In many countries women and men are working full time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household works. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no dubious that by augmentation of societies, inflation and life expenditures climax in a galloping way. Without a shadow of doubt, one of unavoidable corollaries is nothing but working of women out house. It itself brings about some problems, one of which is equally dividing housework between each of spouses. I more or less go for this notion, while cannot shut my eyes on negative aspect. In this essay. We will essay to discuss about both sides.
Running costs of family have been growing up nowadays, as well as to make both ends meet, presence of females as a workforce is tenable. Men cannot single-handedly afford expense of family, such as tuition of school and university of their offspring, bills, installments, charge of purchasing requisite commodities, cost of rental house, health-related issues, etc. If family decides to just go by man’s remuneration, they will likely run out whole income by end of month, while not saving any money for eventual events. Finally, it seems women whether or not should shoulder some responsibilities and parts of disbursements.
Working women for long hours out of house brings about some problems. It simultaneously tends to beget that color of women in household chores fades, which obviously needs to be wittingly amplified by their spouse. Sometimes men have a sideline, leading that spouses cannot exhaustively share household works, needing a third person, taking money, to aid them. Moreover, It behooves women to spend quality time with their babies and toddlers, i.e. giving tutelage to them. It is owing to the fact that babies accept warm maternal embrace than paternal. Thus, by working out, mothers deprive their children of this heavenly gifted boon.
To recapitulate briefly, in modern world working out of women is approximately incumbent. While it comes to acquire to get more money, causing some issues, namely deprivation of children of their presentment and sometimes needing to a third person.
- Some people think having more TV channels is good because they will have more choices While other people think too many TV channels only lead to a lot of poor quality TV programs Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reasons for your answer and in 78
- Many criminals re offend after they have been punished Why do some people continue to commit crime s after they have been punished and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 84
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television 85
- Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic, social and commercial perspectives. What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures? 84
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons.Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a galloping way" with adverb for "galloping"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... inflation and life expenditures climax in a galloping way. Without a shadow of doubt, one of unav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 551, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ventual events. Finally, it seems women whether or not should shoulder some responsibilities a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, finally, if, moreover, so, third, thus, well, while, as to, such as, as well as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26018808777 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90278746333 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645768025078 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3973224227 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2222222222 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169325375271 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476290829554 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496319989435 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0945617309254 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606660969258 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.