Some people think that sending criminals to prison is not effective. Education and job training should be used instead. Do you agree or disagree?
Without a shadow of a doubt, notwithstanding human beings have afoot progression in all fields, they sill struggle with miscellaneous upheaval-causing problems. One of them is about culprits and offenders. According to some, it is of no avail to incarcerate criminals. In lieu of that, it would be utilitarian that they become edified through educational study or adept in a vocation. Although it is useful credence, there exist some other methods. In the following, we will discuss the raised idea and cover other ways.
On the one hand, those who are the proponents of the solution mentioned in the topic put forward consigning the culprits to jail is not efficacious. First and foremost, should a person do criminal activity, it highly likely emanates from the paucity in their education. For instance, the results published in the Nature journal suggest that after the education of some prisoners, their penchant for doing a guilty dwindled exorbitantly. Moreover, thanks to not having an apt career, some persons are unwillingly coerced to make a bandit. To this end, education and job training to what extend can preclude people from being sent to prison.
Meanwhile, those who are opponents of the aforementioned notion avow that some prisoners are hardened criminals, and under no condition do they no relinquish these ignominious activities. Based on that, even if we essay to learn them or impart our knowledge in a specific job, they will not be enlightened. That is, doing a guilty is inveterate and deep-rooted in their sprite, and they have inured in these deeds. To the best of the author's knowledge, the judiciary of Norway put its maximum effort to obviate the flagrant demeanors of such prisoners via education and training, but it was a vain attempt.
To briefly recapitulate, nonetheless, some culpable persons get accustomed to doing crimes, I still do believe the former method is more suitable. We can boil down the essay to two items, i.e., (1) learning and job training can play a crucial role, like a boon, to deter criminals from repeating a crime, (2) those who are experienced and seasoned offenders made a habit of repeating such deeds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-01 | nle.hngoc | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | llrasthy J | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | kencchan | 52 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | nganphuong05 | 84 | view |
- In many countries women and men are working full time. It is therefore, logical for women and men to share household works. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The first graph shows the reasons for studying in the UK by age, while the second graph shows the support given by employers for training by age. 100
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 73
- Crime appears to be rising in most countries in the world, especially among young people. Identify the possible causes of this trend, and propose some solutions you think would be effective. 84
- In some countries, it is becoming increasingly common for people to follow a vegetarian diet. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ing sent to prison. Meanwhile, those who are opponents of the aforementioned notion ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...will not be enlightened. That is, doing a guilty is inveterate and deep-rooted in their ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ured in these deeds. To the best of the authors knowledge, the judiciary of Norway put ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1816.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07262569832 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95572437943 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611731843575 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5677402444 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.823529412 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0588235294 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238208407176 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649431310707 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539893577918 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132871693288 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440817012186 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.