The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The manifested charts evince the fraction of Britain students who are bilingual and or polyglot at a specific institutional establishment in the UK in two different years, i.e., 2000 and 2010.
As can be seen from the upper snapshot, which is for 2000, the lion's share majority of students (30%) were able to speak Spanish in addition to their mother tongue. And the percentage of students who could communicate with the exotic language of French, except the English language, was (15%), which was identical with those persons knowing another language which is not listed, there. The number of students learning two languages or German was the same (10%).
Regarding the chart below, being for 2010, it indicates that most students knew Spanish, which had increased in comparison to 2000. Moreover, the fraction of students picking up only French and or German was identical with those who did not know a foreign language. Furthermore, the number of students who learned another language, except the listed languages, had improved during the 10 years.
Eventually, it can be concluded that the majority of students had a predilection for learning Spanish and or another language, which had escalated during 10 years by 5%. And a fraction of students no longer followed learning French, whatsoever.
- The charts below compare five different countries, showing the electricity used (measured in megawatts or MW) in a typical hospital during one week, and also the number of emergency medical calls made by local residents during the same week. The last char 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant has been deleted 73
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television 85
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 73
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20476190476 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73338725681 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1730507686 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.444444444 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181396024974 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825294775875 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461279652721 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118577309624 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500623296195 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.