Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they released from prison. What do you think are the causes of this? What possible solutions can you suggest?
Crime is something that is banned by government with law and that if who did it is punished. In criminology there are a lot of researches which try to learn the causes and results of this bad propensity. As well as the personality of criminal is the heart topic of that science.
The one of the aims of the penalty is to rehabilitate the one who did the crime to society. However, sometime it could not happen despite of any initiative. If we find out why that aim cannot accomplish, we can comprehend the causes of recidivism.
To illustrate, we can take one person who is a thief and was punished with any penalty. After he gets rid of the punishment, he will be most likely to do this type of demeanor again. Guess why he will do again. The reason why the government gave him freedom, but it cannot find a job which may be avoided that sort of behavior and the one can earn money fairly instead of theft.
It means we cannot fight with crime doing only what we did. I try to explain that the punishment is worth recovering justice, but not enough to bypass next crimes.
It is worth noting that there are a lot of solutions to solve this problem. However, I try to write some of them. In my view, one feasible approach for the governments can be to pay attention to reasons of the crime not only choosing the penalty, but also rehabilitating the person to society. For instance, if the person commits the crime inasmuch as the problem of nerves, the government should give him a hand to control nerves system.
One more feasible approach is, the governments should make the rest of the people understand that criminals are normal persons who have bad tendency and after punishment they can be successful citizen if we give one more chance.
It is worth mentioning that, in my view, we can be successful if we do all of above. To sum up, I can accept these solutions are not suitable for all the crimes and all the criminals. However, I believe everyone is worth one more chance. Also, I should note that believing something is for those who cannot perceive in terms of science.
- Some people believe that sport is an essential part of school life for children, whileothers feel it should be purely optional. Discuss these opposing views and give your own opinion.You should give reasons for your answer, and include ideas and examples 67
- Many people today are worried about cybercrime such as hacking and identity theft What problems does cybercrime cause and what solutions can you suggest for ordinary people and businesses to take 92
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they released from prison. What do you think are the causes of this? What possible solutions can you suggest? 56
- In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people earn.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- With the development of social media, more and more youngsters are being allowed unsupervised access to the internet in order to meet and chat with friends which can lead to potentially dangerous situations. What solutions can you suggest to deal with thi 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...n despite of any initiative. If we find out why that aim cannot accomplish, we can ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, for instance, sort of, as well as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50918635171 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58206360209 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472440944882 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5767355044 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8095238095 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136599967287 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414993954299 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317591014654 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710118955277 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145654112091 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 12.4159519038 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.