Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries.
Why is this the case? Is it a positive development?
It goes without saying that tourism not only brings huge profits to regions but it also makes an outstanding contribution to strengthen the relationship between overseas residents and indigenous citizens. Therefore, many nations are determined to enhance this smokeless industry and I believe that it should be a comprehensively trend if some social aspects will be carefully taken into account.
There are two main reasons behind this revolution which assert that tourism plays a vital role in today’s world as a breakthrough. First of all, politicians cannot deny that travel is an essential tool to broaden the economy of their countries. As a result, the income of local residents will be better when the governments are willing to expand their domestic tourism. For instance, if a lot of travelers visit their countries, there are more infrastructures will be opened such as restaurants, hospitals and so on. Secondly, local people have a chance to get familiar with foreign people which support them to strengthen their cognitive abilities about the world. Take tourist land as a shining example, people here attempt to meet people over the world. Therefore, they may learn to use many different languages due to the diversity of cultural identities.
My own view of the letter is that if politicians can make use of both the benefits of tourism and environmental development, they will be triumphant in the future. Ecosystem is the habitat of many animals include human so that local citizens are responsible for protecting it. When people have good awareness about their roles, tourists will be sympathetic to them. In addition, if people have long term plans to develop the environment, they will exploit its profit longer. According to many experts, environmental damage is the key factor influencing landscapes.
To conclude, tourism plays an important aim in the economic improvement of many developing countries but I totally believe that if the governments issue some laws to protect the nature of scenes, it can bring huge profits from travel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-20 | farshid.manami@yahoo.com | 73 | view |
- Competitiveness is a positive quality for people in most societies. How does competitiveness affect individuals? Is it a positive or negative trend? 73
- Do the dangers derived from the use of chemicals in food production and preservation outweigh the advantages? 78
- There are many types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important and should it be preserved or is international music that is heard everywhere nowadays more useful to a society? 78
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 73
- 06/6/2015: Some people prefer to help or support directly in the local community for people who need it, however, others prefer to give money to the national or international charities, discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('comprehensively') instead an adjective, or a noun ('trend') instead of another adjective.
...ndustry and I believe that it should be a comprehensively trend if some social aspects will be carefull...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 796, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...world. Therefore, they may learn to use many different languages due to the diversity of cultu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'termed'.
Suggestion: termed
... them. In addition, if people have long term plans to develop the environment, they ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26888217523 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96709346538 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604229607251 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1536788698 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.266666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147636601281 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460237627189 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293340555099 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876237207176 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284967642573 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.