Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries. Why is it the case? Is it a positive development?
Recently, developing nations has had a tendency to attach more importance to tourism. I believe that this practice is a positive development, as it could bring certain benefits to these countries, mainly regarding economy and cultural image.
When it comes to tourism, either domestic or cross-border travel could boost the national economy. The tourist industries not only create such job opportunities related to hospitality and catering, but also help preserve some traditional ones such as pottery- making for local residents . As a result, the problem of unemployment could be resolved and the gross national production could increase. In Vietnam, for example, Nha Trang is a city whose economy and development depend largely on tourism activities, and the fact that Bat Trang pottery village in Hanoi has become a tourist attraction improves the living standard of the local inhabitants. Additionally, expanding tourism is necessary to promote the nation’s cultural aspects to foreign tourists when they understand local customs and explore cultural heritages. Hence, this could boost international image of the country and enhance cultural and economical cooperation among nations.
However, these countries may encounter certain inevitable negative impacts when expanding tourist industries. The major problems are relevant to pollution, which exert detrimental effect on the scenery and the locals’living quality. There are also cases that cultural misunderstanding has led to the local’s grudge against tourists. Nevertheless, tourism is still a potential field and the impacts could be combated by promoting green tourism and tourists’ doing research into the targeted country’s culture before traveling. Therefore, expanding tourism is a positive development.
In conclusion, I believe investing in tourist industries is beneficial to developing countries thanks to economical and cultural reasons.
- The two maps below show the developments along Olive Drive before and after the construction of new facilities between 1980 and 2010 76
- The charts give information about the volunteers by organization in 2008 and 2018 Summarizing the report by describing the main features with comparing data 89
- The maps below show the changes in a town in Europe after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam Describe the noticeable changes in the maps 81
- The two maps below show the changes in town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram below shows changes that took place in Youngsville in New Zealand over a 25 year period from 1980 to 2005 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...h as pottery- making for local residents . As a result, the problem of unemploymen...
^^
Line 2, column 720, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ism is necessary to promote the nation’s cultural aspects to foreign tourists whe...
^^
Line 2, column 910, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...of the country and enhance cultural and economical cooperation among nations. However, t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92446043165 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12270521851 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636690647482 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3281578183 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.642857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200057540005 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715198067721 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643172285223 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145758283553 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608508036845 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 50.2224549098 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.