Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers.
Do you agree or disagree?
Telecommuting is becoming increasingly popular in modern days for its undeniable convenience. However, there have been opinions against this practice claiming that it may negatively affect the employers. Personally, I believe that not only does telework benefit workers but it also brings many advantages to their companies.
Firstly, teleworking helps companies reduce costs substantially. Because telecommuters do not go to a central workplace, the employers will not have to pay for renting offices, equipping furniture and stationery, and hiring cleaners. This amount of money might be better spent on advertising, upgrading products and human resources which are essential for the company’s long-term development.
Secondly, working from home increases the company’s profitability. At home, workers are more focused on their work because they work under a comfortable condition and on a flexible schedule, thus reducing stress level. In addition, in offices there are a lot of distractions such as colleagues’ chatting or worries about family responsibilities. Telework can have all those problems solved and boost staffs’ productivity. What I want to emphasize here is the correlation between productivity and lucrativeness. The more efficiently employees work, the higher profit their company will obtain.
Finally, telecommuting allows the company to maintain its operation in case of emergency. For instance, when a flood, heavy rain or a epidemic strikes and people are not recommended to go out or meet others, working from home proves to be one of the best solutions to preventing loss in productivity and revenue to the organization. This is also the reason why it is highly suggested that companies consider teleworking as part of their preparation for severe weather events and contagious diseases.
On the whole, although there are convincing arguments against the practice of telecommuting, I believe the mutual benefits that it brings to both workers and employers are much greater than the loss it may cause.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | nirav malaviya | 84 | view |
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology. Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers, not the employers. Do agree or disagree? 56
- More and more people are using computer and other electronic devices to access information So printing of books magazine and newspaper should be done Discuss both view and give your opinion 90
- More and more people are using computer and other electronic devices to access information So printing of books magazine and newspaper should be done Discussion both views and give your opinion 33
- Many employees may work at home with the modern technology Some people claim that it can benefit only the workers not the employers Do agree or disagree 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 133, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r instance, when a flood, heavy rain or a epidemic strikes and people are not rec...
^
Line 13, column 171, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended going', 'recommended gonna'.
Suggestion: recommended going; recommended gonna
...r a epidemic strikes and people are not recommended to go out or meet others, working from home p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in addition, such as, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71428571429 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33189658135 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.906163674 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153370787013 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433426351564 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407849918706 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761496946536 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495904741209 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.