The vast majority of governments put economic advancement in their priorities as they believe it is the most important area that should be taken into consideration. Whereas a group of individuals express that other areas in a society have an equal importance.
From the most governments' point of view, not struggling with financial issues makes a person to be content with their lives. In their opinion countries will not flourish in other areas if there is no monetary support available. For example, building schools, hospitals, and roads as well as providing educational, medical, and health care facilities all would not be accomplished if there is no sufficient revenue to invest in. As a result, authorities by the right political movements try to step in this direction and sometimes neglect to advance in other aspect of lives.
However, a group of people justifiably argue that for being content with living in a country just monetary factor is not important. In other words, In spite of the fact that Japan is among the top financially powerful countries the suicide rate has been skyrocketed in this region. In my opinion, psychological progress is another type of progress that should not be neglect. For example, TV channels should mostly allocate to broadcasting programs to boost viewers mentally well-beings. This could be performed by employing a lot of psychologists to monitor the Media's activities. Moreover, Freedom, democracy, and being able to express your opposite opinion without any fear also are proved to be crucial. To clarify, every day a lot of protests and internal wars are done by citizens in the nations in which people are deprived of any freedom.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that financial success is essencial but psychological matters and freedom is two other crucial factors for individuals' satisfaction which should not be overlooked by higher level administers.
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 70
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 89
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hat should be taken into consideration. Whereas a group of individuals express that oth...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overlooked by higher level administers.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2345276873 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00848852311 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599348534202 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9075136594 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.785714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193834146639 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642047354394 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497442722299 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107472623403 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416364694799 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hat should be taken into consideration. Whereas a group of individuals express that oth...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overlooked by higher level administers.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2345276873 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00848852311 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599348534202 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9075136594 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.785714286 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193834146639 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642047354394 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497442722299 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107472623403 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416364694799 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.