Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not localpeople. Why is this the case, and what can be done to attract more local peopleto visit these places?

Essay topics:

Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local

people. Why is this the case, and what can be done to attract more local people

to visit these places?

Museums and historical sites are favorite tourist attractions of visitors instead of local residents. This problem is caused by several factors, and effective solutions should be proposed to address it.

There are several reasons why local citizens do not often visit museums and and historical sites. First of all, because local people are too familiar with these sites, they might think that they fully understand these places and it is a waste of time money visiting museums and and historical sites. Consequently, they might spend money travelling other places that are new to them. Furthermore, having to pay entrance fee prevents the poor from visiting museums and and historical sites. For example, because of not having enough money to buy entrance tickets, many underprivileged people in Ha Noi cannot pay a visit to The Temple of Literature.

Some actions should be taken to attract more local residents to visit these sites. The first solution is that goverments should lower the entry fees for local residents, which might encourage more local people, especially the poor, to go to museums and and historical sites. In addition, it is essential for local citizens to be educated on the values of these places. This can be done by conducting campaigns to widen people’s knowledge about museums and and historical sites. Finally, to attract more local residents, states should organise festivals or leisure activities in these places.

In conclusion, the fact that museums and and historical sites cannot attract local people happens because of some reasons, and there are several measures to solve this problem.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-26 dtth045 73 view
Essays by user dtth045 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...cal citizens do not often visit museums and and historical sites. First of all, because...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
... a waste of time money visiting museums and and historical sites. Consequently, they mi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...prevents the poor from visiting museums and and historical sites. For example, because ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
..., especially the poor, to go to museums and and historical sites. In addition, it is es...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...n people's knowledge about museums and and historical sites. Finally, to attract m...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 39, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
... In conclusion, the fact that museums and and historical sites cannot attract local p...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, furthermore, so, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30769230769 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66079080206 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511538461538 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3865933582 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.153846154 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397997968602 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151198113497 0.084324248473 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698017039025 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231837857758 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049416614985 0.056905535591 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.