Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
It is true that museums and historical places often attract visitors rather than local residents. There are a number of reasons behind this phenomenon and some solutions should be adopted by the government and individuals to improve the situation.
In the first place, it is vital to analyze why tourists from different regions of the world prefer visiting the museums and historical sites to local inhabitants. It can hardly be denied that the first main contributing factor might be that individuals find visiting museums not interesting since they are acquainted with the local citizens. As a result, people have a tendency to travel abroad to experience new customs and cultures. Also, another root reason is that entrance tickets are expensive for the locals to purchase. Consequently, they may have little or no interest in studying their historical culture.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken into full consideration to prevent this problem. The first solution would be that government should renovate the exhibits according to both education and entertainment purposes to increase the number of local visitors and then launch a wide advertisement campaign to promote their stunning landscapes on television or the Internet. This also encourages more local residents to understand the uniqueness of these locations. A second measure would be that the local authorities can lessen or give free tickets to local people on a special occasion to enhance their enthusiasm.
In conclusion, it is clear that there are various reasons why local inhabitants do not visit local museums and historical sites, and steps need to be taken to attract more visitors from the local areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-02 | thaotanya | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-28 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | mbn250 | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 92
- Some people believe that government money should be spent on important things rather than arts such as painting and music To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...act more visitors from the local areas.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, then, thus, in conclusion, as a result, it is true, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37078651685 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87956774411 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580524344569 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8150187139 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447619888649 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146435654442 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100696698356 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262078151037 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658939774292 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.