Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Concerning the issue of improving the tourism situation, it is widely believed that plenty of museums and historical destinations are mainly visited by newcomers instead of local residents. Personally, some of the most common causes will be analyzed in this writing, followed by responsible solutions.
The discussion can be start with a look into the potential reasons why tourists are likely to be attracted by museums and historical sites rather than the local inhabitants. First of all, one of the main causes of this matter is that these tourist attractions are too familiar to the inhabitants there. This is due to the fact that the locals should be fed up with the museums if they remain unchanged over time. Second of all, the more serious reason in this case is that people would prefer to take a long-lasting trip rather than a short one. The main basic is probably because they want to go somewhere they have not been before instead of visiting the sites they see everyday. Last but not least, some historical sites are not only out-of-date but also expensive for locals to afford. Therefore, the inhabitants are not interested in visiting these museums and historical sites anymore.
Actually, there are a few ways to take action against this issue. The first possible solution is to improve the facilities in the historical sites and offer free tickets for the local residents to pay a visit whenever they want. Taking on the second problem, the most successful way to confront this would be for the authorities to arrange some exhibits or contests monthly for the locals to participate in.
Taking everything into account, the mentioned discussions are convincing enough to lead me to draw a conclusion that if the government and local inhabitants paid more attention on improving these museums and historical sites, there would be a significant change in local tourism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Tấn Quý | 30 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | thaotanya | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-28 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree 78
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 73
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 672, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... instead of visiting the sites they see everyday. Last but not least, some historical si...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, look, second, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0447284345 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7528369809 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539936102236 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.757056518 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.461538462 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429185858848 0.244688304435 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140546643484 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672607659606 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233004041644 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103516161764 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.