Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people, like the homeless and unemployed. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Concerning the issue of foreign aid, it is widely believed that some developed countries had better not waste their money on the international aid while they have their own unfortunate inhabitants, such as the people who do not have a house or a job. As far as I am concerned, I do partially agree with this point of view due to some following reasons.
First of all, it can be said with certainty that government’s priority should be spent on the improvement of their disadvantaged citizens rather than help other countries. By this way, their citizens can have a chance to overcome poverty, have a better life and even contribute to the development of the countries.
In addition to this, a subsequent factor could be because foreign aid sometimes makes other undeveloped countries more and more dependent on the developed countries. Day by day, the government in these countries may have lost their citizens’ beliefs and face a lot of economic-social problems. For instance, despite numberous effort made by the UN and other rich countries, some countries in Africa can not make full use of the aid be conditional on other countries’ supply.
In contrast, it must be admitted that by international aid, developed countries can create a good impression on other countries. Furthermore, it help poor countries to improve their economy, create more job vacancies and make a lot of profit to pay all the debt for the rich ones.
Taking everything into consideration, people have to weigh up in their thoughts to what extent this issue should be supported. However, the discussions are convincing enough to lead me to the conclusion that developed countries should spend money on foreign aid when there are not any homeless or jobless people existing in the own countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-09 | Lee Daisy | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree 78
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 61
- Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...ion on other countries. Furthermore, it help poor countries to improve their economy...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03716216216 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01514734221 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547297297297 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.3737250434 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.545454545 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291316691193 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111114965825 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947519790766 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172230292423 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120621540953 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.