Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Currently, the entrance fee of museum-goers has sparked controversy heated worldwide. Some people argue that the public who goes to museums has to pay for their entry, whereas the remaining object-exhibited places are complimentary. In this essay, I shall investigate both the benefits and drawbacks of the latter system.
It is undeniable that the price of tickets can bring about detrimental impacts on people, societies, and the museums themselves. From the citizens' standpoint, they are not promoted to visit and struggle to access beneficial information and knowledge freely, especially the poor due to they can not afford such amount. Furthermore, from society's vantage point, the public will have little chance to come to paramount importance significant place to study history, geography, and some essential subjects. Moreover, from the museums' perspective, they can not achieve their goals which is an education to the human race. They lose income and one more consequence which has to close down as they lose lots of their customers.
Despite the aforementioned minus point above, I am convinced that the admission charge brings myriad plus points. Initially, museums need to pay their bill to function such as personnel expenditure, equipment, electricity, and water bill. Secondly, they can utilize profit to upgrade the place more state-of-art and impressive to attract to the civilization, an example of this is updating their expositions and keeping everything presentable. Having visited many museums myself, I have learned that some museums sell tickets better than the others which do not charge entry fees regarding information, management, and places.
In conclusion, the upsides of an admission fee for museum-goer outweigh the downsides. I recognize that the best possible system for a nation is for both systems to work in tandem thus benefiting each other .
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 100
- The diagram shows the consumption of renewable energy in the USA from 1949 2008 Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer identifying the main trends and making comparisons where relevant 84
- Countries are become more and more similar because people are able to buy the same prodcuts anywhere in the world Do you think this is positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...s, and the museums themselves. From the citizens standpoint, they are not promoted to vi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 523, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'museums'' or 'museum's'?
Suggestion: museums'; museum's
... essential subjects. Moreover, from the museums perspective, they can not achieve their...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ork in tandem thus benefiting each other .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, as to, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47422680412 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02713962519 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632302405498 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3921286035 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.785714286 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242754342448 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784496963464 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821976153286 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15565818505 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083447855387 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.