Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Paying charges for museum admission has more advantages than offering free entry. There are three primary reasons supporting the notion that museums should collect fees.
Firstly, while providing free admission may attract a larger number of visitors, museums still require financial resources to cover maintenance and exhibition costs. Without charging fees, museums may struggle to remain open due to the high operational expenses involved. Consequently, people would be deprived of the opportunity to appreciate astonishing artworks in the future.
Secondly, implementing entrance fees can enhance the overall visitor experience. When individuals are required to pay, they tend to value and appreciate the exhibits more. This selective process ensures that only those genuinely interested or dedicated fans invest their time and money in exploring the museum. As a result, a serene and suitable environment is created, allowing visitors to fully immerse themselves in the art without any disturbances. Conversely, if free entry was permitted, the museum may become overcrowded and noisy, detracting from the overall ambiance and diminishing the experience for visitors.
Lastly, charging admission fees benefits not only the museums but also the artists. It serves as a form of recognition and encouragement for artists to continue creating remarkable works. By paying for entry, visitors demonstrate their support and appreciation for the artists' talents and contributions. In contrast, if museums were free of charge, there would be a risk of undervaluing the efforts of artists and neglecting their creations.
In conclusion, the advantages of collecting entrance fees outweigh the disadvantages. Financial sustainability is crucial for museums to maintain their operations and provide an exceptional cultural experience for visitors. Charging fees also ensures a more meaningful and tranquil museum visit, while simultaneously acknowledging and supporting the artistic community. Therefore, I firmly believe that implementing admission charges in museums is essential for their continued success and the preservation of art appreciation.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- As global trade increases many goods even some daily goods are exported to another country which includes long distance transport during shipping Do you think its benefits outweigh its drawbacks Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant exampl 89
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98058252427 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16147606802 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614886731392 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7274138768 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389889477746 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118841620062 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103090507955 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240313596912 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937290391502 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.