People have different views that whether museums should set the entrance fees for admission. While setting entrance fees may be inconvenient for the visitors, I still believe that setting fees for admission is more beneficial to the museums.
On the one hand, the museums with no fees can encourage people to visit the museums and earn the valuable knowledge of traditional culture, science and technology etc. Museums are the great sources of information for students to explore the extra knowledge that cannot acquire from their lessons or books. By providing a free interactive learning environment for students, they are triggered to learn and become more motivate to think. In addition, the museums can be the medium to spread our domestic history and culture to the foreign visitors. The free of entrance can attract more visitors to understand our community deeply, which is also benefit to the tourism industries.
On the other hand, although charging people for entering the museums may be reduce the attractive of museums, it is perhaps more important to set the entrance fees for reducing the burden of the museums. The major advantage is that the fees for admission can control the amount of visitors. It is interesting to notice that there are massive of people visit the free museums during the public holidays, and the situation of overload can be relieve by setting the fees. Secondly, museums usually store many historical or rare materials that cannot be restored, administrators of museums always need lots of budgets for the maintenance of high quality exhibitions. There are several examples that museums stop to operate due to lack of budgets. Therefore, setting fees is crucial for supporting the sustainable development of museums.
In conclusion, I can understand why people might argue that the museums should be free for visiting, but it seems to me that the advantages of setting entrance fees overweigh this drawbacks.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below compares changes in the both rates of China and the US between 1920 and 2000. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 645, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'benefited', 'benefitted'.
Suggestion: benefited; benefitted
...and our community deeply, which is also benefit to the tourism industries. On the ot...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 834, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the sustainable development of museums. In conclusion, I can understand why peop...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ages of setting entrance fees overweigh this drawbacks.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21904761905 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7564624358 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51746031746 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4323274159 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.428571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353197495156 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12541269144 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549596128906 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222083528286 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626919468961 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.