Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
A host of criminals perpetrate more violence after serving the primary penalty. There are two principal reasons for this, lack of rehabilitation and shortage of employment opportunities. This essay would like to configure further detail about the reasons and recommend some possible strategies to tackle these issues.
One of the main reason for committing more crime is due to the lack of a rehabilitation center. This is because of felon are unable to experience the social life during their serving period. For instance, a recent survey by the United Nation Organization showed, about one-third proportion of offenders pledge crimes as they don't know the meaning of social life. Similarly, there is no one to guide and stimulate them. Consequently, the crime rate dramatically increased. To tackle this issue authorities must provide liberty to delinquent within the jail. As a result, they may get a chance to explore the social life which may bring enormous positive results.
Another reason that needs to be considered is the unavailability of employment. Therefore, due to the scarcity of jobs, they are compelled to attempt the crime for their livelihood. As an example, it is disputable that, if the people are indulged in any sorts of work then the crime rate may significantly plummet. However, due to the criminal records delinquent are unable to find the desire works. To solve this issue, bureaucrats must stimulate them as well as assist them to find a appropriate job. By implementing this, it will be helped for them to reintegrate in society.
As such it can be concluded that offenders undertake crime because of lack of recovery centers and unavailability of employment. However, guiding and assisting the criminal to find the proper job will bring positive outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-06 | Milan karki | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Milan karki | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Milan karki | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-14 | quynh nguyen2108 | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graphs show percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features. 84
- Some experts believe that is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. 84
- The diagram below shows the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 73
- The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentages of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tion of offenders pledge crimes as they dont know the meaning of social life. Simila...
^^^^
Line 9, column 485, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ate them as well as assist them to find a appropriate job. By implementing this, ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, similarly, so, then, therefore, third, well, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2491349481 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98902259198 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560553633218 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0579756932 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.2777777778 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0555555556 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215814651329 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632847857043 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462672859547 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127528885425 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268576704993 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.