Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
A host of criminals perpetrate more violence after serving the primary penalty. There are two principal reasons for this, lack of rehabilitation and shortage of employment opportunities. This essay would like to configure further detail about the reasons and recommend some possible strategies to tackle these issues.
One of the main reason for committing more crime is due to the lack of a rehabilitation center. This is because of felon are unable to experience the social life during their serving period. For instance, a recent survey by the United Nation Organization showed, about one-third proportion of offenders pledge crimes as they don't know the meaning of social life. Similarly, there is no one to guide and stimulate them. Consequently, the crime rate dramatically increased. To tackle this issue authorities must give liberty to delinquent within the jail. As a result, they may get a chance to explore the social life which may bring enormous positive results.
Another reason that needs to be considered is the unavailability of employment. Therefore, due to the scarcity of jobs, they are compelled to attempt the crime for their livelihood. As an example, it is disputable that, if the people are indulged in any sorts of work then the crime rate may be significantly declined. However, due to the criminal records delinquent are unable to find the desire works. To solve this issue, bureaucrats must stimulate them as well as aid them to find a proper job. By implementing this, it will be helped for them to reintegrate in society.
As such it can be concluded that offenders undertake crime because of lack of recovery centers and unavailability of employment. However, guiding and assisting the criminal to find the proper job will bring positive outcomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-06 | Milan karki | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Milan karki | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Milan karki | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-14 | quynh nguyen2108 | 73 | view |
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 84
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults (aged 16 years and over) whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...tion of offenders pledge crimes as they dont know the meaning of social life. Simila...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, may, similarly, so, then, therefore, third, well, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20344827586 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97519671309 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555172413793 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4322890694 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.8333333333 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221476335404 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648595065858 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455387049818 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130368673088 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250127950845 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.