Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
It is an interesting subject of discussion as to whether old buildings should be preserved by law because of their historical value or should be pulled down to make new houses and offices to accommodate the increasing population. In my viewpoint, I believed that it is extremely important to maintain the heritage for two reasons: reflect our culture and historical importance and the government should not let history stand out of the way of development.
Protecting certain old buildings is important for several reasons. Firstly, it provides an insight look about our ancestry life for a thousand years ago, how they live and survive. The world can know about our ancient history, our story and more. As a result, it is a pride for countries and helps culture attachment. Secondly, its historical value means a lot to their countries. It might remind them how hard they fought for freedom but also remembrance those they lost. So that when students look back to history monument, they sincerely, grateful, understand and live a better life that deserves ancestors' deserts.
However, this certainly does not mean that modernization should be discouraged. I believed that old buildings and modern ones can create a new attraction that may help to improve beauty and important. Several countries preserved heritage places such as Japan, London, Paris and more than thousands of people visited these metropolis cities. Also, it is the existence of those constructions that teach the youth about nations' history. As a result, they improve their acknowledgment that lead to countries' progress. That is the reason why the government should renovate them rather than destroy it.
In conclusion, I strongly believed that we should protect and improve countries' old buildings as we can learn about history and world culture. Such knowledge can also help people to understand how to modernize the countries in the best ways
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-06 | Narendrasinh Dabhi | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | Narendrasinh Dabhi | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Narendrasinh Dabhi | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Narendrasinh Dabhi | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | Vo My Anh | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 89
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 56
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...is an interesting subject of discussion as to whether old buildings should be preserved by la...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to improve beauty and important. Several countries preserved heritage places such...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, as to, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19677419355 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84544837993 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7204642725 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7647058824 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2352941176 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304143849748 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853770542377 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701872889274 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190499302064 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05851817105 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.