Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones.
How important is it to maintain old buildings?
Should history stand in the way of progress?
It is true to the fact that quite a number of historical structures are still governed by the country but some people contend that they must be demolished to build new infrastructure. In this essay, I shall site the importance of preserving old buildings and discuss that history is not a hindrance on a country's development.
It is ubiquitous in many countries to have a unique place, usually heritage site, for them to show the world about the people and places they have in the past as well as the abundance of their culture. Maintaning and protecting these ancient buildings will help future generations to have a vicarious experience of the past events through the remaining artifacts. For instance, the historical Great Wall of China, the only man-made structure visible on outer space as an urban legend says, not only depicts the borders made by Qin dynasty to protect their country from outside invaders but also tells the sufferings of forced laborers who sacrificed their lives to finish the wall. As a result, the Great Wall became one of the famous tourist destination in the whole world portraying the brilliant minds of the ancient people creating a beautiful and magnificent architecture that lasts for centuries.
Meanwhile, some people believe that some ancient structures must be replaced as they think that these buildings can delay or hinder a country's progress. Inspite of their reasons, these infrastructure plays an important role in a country making a great contributor to its development, and they must and always be protected as the present and future designs are shaped from the past by the story and architecture embedded in it.
In conclusion, though some people think that ancient buildings must be replaced, it is greatly important to preserve them as a treasure to the future people for them to understand the past and make their own development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-04 | drtruong92 | 61 | view |
| 2017-07-18 | MonicaSanta | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05448717949 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84251145714 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535256410256 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.2975951904 168% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.6709573745 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.222222222 106.682146367 164% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.6666666667 20.7667163134 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4444444444 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212835570888 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102732113452 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728551232451 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154662657773 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610403415125 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.1190380762 154% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.